Put option volatility surface water

A producer of electricity, both literally and figuratively. When you buy the Finance Add-in. A pH adjustment chemical is the only additive for the cycle in this treatment scheme. The pH of the water should also be tested regularly. A hard, black coal with high energy content, often referred to as hard coal. The maximum load-carrying ability of a power plant under specified conditions for a given time interval.

Find all of your industry-related resources in one spot. Visit the POWER store now. The lifeblood of the combined cycle plant is its water chemistry program. This is particularly true for plants designed for high pressures and temperatures as well as fast starts and cycling. Even though such plants are increasingly common, no universal chemistry program can be used for all of them. Injust a little more than 50 years ago, the first heat recovery steam generator HRSG was connected to a gas turbine and the combined cycle power plant was born.

However, it was not until the mids that advances in high-temperature materials and air-cooling of gas turbine blades made the combined cycle power plant commercially attractive. Development of the combined cycle power plant design has rapidly improved, and today a variety of both simple and complex plant configurations exist. As designers strive to optimize cycle efficiency and heat recovery, the designs grow more intricate, involving multiple pressure circuits, complex piping arrangements, and exotic materials.

These increases in cycle complexity and efficiency have also been associated with increases in the number of HRSG tube failures. Data compiled by the Electric Power Research Institute EPRI indicated that of the top five modes of HRSG tube failure, four flow-accelerated corrosion, corrosion fatigue, under-deposit corrosion, and pitting had links to or could be influenced by cycle chemistry.

See the sidebar for additional resources on these subjects. In the past, many attempted to apply the same guidelines established for industrial water tube drum-type boilers to combined cycle power plants. As the volume of operating experience on HRSG and combined cycle power plants grew, it became clear that this class of power generating equipment had unique chemistry considerations that needed to be addressed in a different fashion than typical water-tube drum-type industrial or power boilers.

In fact, last year the ASME Research Committee on Water and Steam in Thermal Systems issued recommendations specific to combined cycle power plants. There are so many different design configurations that selecting the proper chemistry plan and establishing optimal chemistry operating limits can be challenging. Therefore, it is impossible to develop universal guidelines.

Unlike most conventional fossil or nuclear power units, combined cycle power plants generally operate at several temperatures and pressures. Multi-pressure HRSG circuits low pressure [LP], intermediate pressure [IP], and high pressure [HP] within a common HRSG casing are the norm rather than the exception, and these different circuits may be drum circuits, once-through circuits, or a combination of both styles. Combined cycle plants also are designed with complex flow patterns; during startup, some tubes in the HRSG may sit stagnant or even flow in the opposite direction from operation.

IP steam may be utilized for combustion turbine cooling. A whole host of design and operation variations can exist and may affect the choice of chemistry program and limits. Four basic types of cycle chemistry programs are described by EPRI, ASME, the International Association for the Properties of Steam and Water, and other entities. They are phosphate treatment, caustic treatment, all-volatile treatment, and oxygenated treatment programs.

Phosphate and caustic treatment programs are only applicable to drum-style units, while oxygenated and all-volatile programs can be implemented on once-through or drum-style units. Phosphate treatment programs for boiler waters have been around for nearly 70 years and are probably the most commonly utilized treatment programs in drum-style units. Coordinated phosphate chemistry was first introduced in the s by Whirl and Purcell and was based on the addition of trisodium phosphate TSP to the drum water.

In the s, congruent phosphate treatment was introduced. This program, which was based on maintaining a sodium-to-phosphate ratio in the range of 2. Despite the successes that many plants experienced operating on the congruent phosphate program, some units, particularly those operating at higher pressures greater than 2, psi and with higher heat fluxes, developed problems with phosphate hideout.

The s brought another phosphate treatment program in response to those put option volatility surface water that were having difficulty with phosphate hideout: equilibrium phosphate treatment. The theory behind equilibrium phosphate treatment was that each unit must independently determine its own equilibrium sky hd rf output options 1 5 for phosphate. Put option volatility surface water approach considers put option volatility surface water different operating conditions of each boiler, such as boiler firing rate, unit cleanliness, heat flux, and fuel variations, all of which can affect the maximum concentration of phosphate that a unit can tolerate without scale building up on boiler surfaces.

The shift to equilibrium phosphate treatment was a positive step for many operators dealing with phosphate hideout issues; however, implementation of this program was sometimes confusing, and some of the units operating on equilibrium chemistry still experienced failures, but now the failures were linked to hydrogen damage. The latest revision to this long history of phosphate drum water treatment programs is the phosphate continuum PC treatment program introduced by EPRI in PC L treatment is designed for units using high-quality demineralized makeup water using low levels 0.

Caustic treatment CT programs have been used successfully in drum-style units where difficulties with phosphate hideout have been experienced. CT programs have been historically more popular in European countries than in the U. Recently, however, this type of treatment program has been regaining popularity in the U. As drum pressure increases, the dosage rate of sodium hydroxide decreases along with the protection level that this treatment program provides.

Therefore, CT programs are impractical for implementation in units operating above 2, psi Figure 2. All-volatile treatment AVT programs have a long history of successful application in conventional fossil units and are applicable to combined cycle power plants that operate with high-quality demineralized water and very good feedwater quality.

There are two basic variations of AVT programs utilized in plants today: oxidizing all-volatile treatment AVT O and reducing all-volatile treatment AVT R. Full-flow condensate polishing is strongly recommended for units designed to operate using either AVT O or AVT R chemistries due put option volatility surface water the extremely limited ability of units operating under these chemistry regimes to tolerate contaminant ingress.

Polishers are especially necessary for units designed with seawater or high total dissolved solids TDS circulating cooling water. AVT O is only applicable to units designed with all-ferrous metallurgy and utilizes ammonia or a neutralizing amine to elevate the pH of the condensate and feedwater to maintain a pH greater than 9. A pH adjustment chemical is the only additive for the cycle in this treatment scheme.

The put option volatility surface water oxygen concentration in the system is controlled solely through mechanical means, creating a slightly oxidizing environment and a slightly positive oxidization reduction potential ORP. AVT R is recommended for units designed with copper alloys in the system and units with steam hosts. Like AVT Put option volatility surface waterthis program utilizes ammonia or a neutralizing amine to elevate the pH of the condensate and feedwater.

However, the pH under this treatment scenario is limited to a maximum of 9. The addition of the oxygen scavenger creates a reducing environment and a corresponding negative ORP. Oxygenated treatment OT programs are not commonly utilized in combined cycle power plants due to the cycling nature of most plant designs, but these treatment programs may be applicable for some baseloaded plants or for plant designs that include once-through HRSG pressure circuits. OT programs, also sometimes called combined water treatment CWT programs, use oxygenated high-purity water to minimize corrosion and FAC in the feedwater system.

This type of chemistry is only put option volatility surface water for units that contain all-ferrous metallurgy in the cycle and that do not experience routine cyclic operation. Full-flow condensate polishers are required in the design to maintain the feedwater purity required to employ these treatment regimes. OT utilizes ammonia or a neutralizing amine to elevate the pH of the condensate and feedwater. Copper alloys in the cycle, downstream of the condensate polisher, are not compatible with OT programs, as the presence of oxygenated water will result in dissolution of those alloys at an accelerated pace.

In a drum-style circuit, the pH is maintained within the range of 9. The optimal pH of the circuit must be determined in the field and should be based on minimization of iron transport in the cycle. The most commonly used oxidant is oxygen gas. Air and liquid oxygen are also utilized in some plants. Air, however, contains undesirable contaminants such as carbon dioxide and, therefore, its use is generally discouraged. Design parameters for the unit and the chemistry program need to go hand-in-hand; there is no one-size-fits-all chemistry program, and even the best treatment program cannot compensate for improper material selection or poorly designed system components.

The process of selecting the chemistry treatment program needs to keep the uniqueness of the combined cycle plant in mind and should consider many plant parameters, including steam purity requirements, condenser cooling system design, presence and type of condensate polishers, potential put option volatility surface water condensate contamination, condensate put option volatility surface water feedwater system metallurgy, cycle design, operating pressure, the use of duct burners, cycling service or quick-start requirements, and the availability of a chemist to quickly implement corrective action—should it be required.

HRSG and Steam Turbine. In some instances, however, the HRSG or combustion turbine components may have limits based on their design or operation that are more stringent than the chemistry requirements dictated by the steam turbine limits. One specific example is a combustion turbine design where IP steam is utilized for cooling. In this instance, the purity of the IP steam to meet the combustion turbine requirements is free forex trading robot reviews video stringent than the purity that would normally be required based on steam turbine OEM limits.

This is why it is important to collect and review all chemistry guidelines supplied by the OEMs for all major pieces of equipment. The addition of multiple separate pressure circuits to the HRSG to supply IP or LP put option volatility surface water for services such as deaeration and feedwater heating has been an important improvement in the steam cycle efficiency and has been applied to most combined cycle power plant designs.

But the intermingling of condensate, feedwater, and steam systems within the combined cycle power plant generally requires all HRSG circuits to be restricted to the same chemistry limits as the highest pressure circuit. Although originally intended to improve simple cycle plant efficiency by absorbing and utilizing the waste heat from a gas turbine or turbines in a steam turbine, many HRSGs are now designed to incorporate the routine use of duct burners.

When choosing operating chemistry limits and the appropriate treatment for the HRSG, operators and designers need to consider these higher operating pressures as limiting design conditions. Operating experience has shown that the most prevalent cause of phosphate hideout in a HRSG is operation of the duct burners. The degree of hideout experienced generally varies with the firing capacity of the duct burners: The greater the rate at which a unit is duct fired, the more severe the hideout issues experienced generally are.

Frequency of duct burner use should be factored into the chemistry selection process, and unit testing during duct burner operation should be performed to determine how a given unit will respond if a phosphate treatment program is selected for application at the facility. If phosphate hideout is severe and maintenance of proper drum chemistry becomes a challenge, the operator may be better served by implementing a caustic or AVT program at the plant. Several once-through HRSG designs are available that do not include a steam drum in one or more of the various HRSG pressure circuits.

Once-through units, on the other hand, are designed such that feedwater is pumped into the HRSG in the liquid phase and is converted to steam as it passes through the heat exchangers in the HRSG. No provisions are provided in this design for concentration and mechanical removal of impurities. Whatever contaminants are present in the feedwater are transported to the turbine in the steam. Condensate polishing is crucial to establishing and maintaining this high level of purity in the cycle, and chemistry choices are limited to OT and AVT programs.

At drum pressures of 2, psi or higher, contaminants such as sodium and chloride present in the boiler water easily vaporize with the steam and carry over to the steam turbine. Selection of a cycle chemistry treatment program is significantly simplified when the system metallurgy is all ferrous and no copper alloys are present in the cycle. This includes the condenser tubes, feedwater heater tubes, condensate and feedwater pumps, and any heat exchangers belonging to a host that receives steam supply from the plant.

Copper alloys possess excellent heat transfer characteristics but are susceptible to ammonia attack and, therefore, the presence of these alloys in the system limits operating pH in the condensate and feedwater to approximately 9. Systems with copper alloy components can not operate on AVT O or OT. Chemistry treatment programs for these units are limited to AVT Rphosphate, or caustic.

For all-ferrous units, all four types of treatment programs are applicable. Two-phase FAC, on the other hand, which is common in many HRSG LP evaporator circuits, is not impacted by reducing or oxidizing chemistry the addition or absence of an oxygen scavenger. Adding phosphate or caustic, however, is not always possible in the LP evaporator. The chemical treatment of the LP drum varies depending on HRSG arrangement. In other configurations, some of the drums are in series with drum water from one drum usually the LP providing feedwater to other steam drums usually IP and HP drums.

In configurations where the LP drum is the feedwater source for higher-pressure IP and HP drums, phosphate or sodium hydroxide cannot be added to the LP drum to provide protection against two-phase FAC. The same challenge exists in designs where water from the LP drum is used for steam attemperation. In designs where water from the LP drum is used for steam attemperation, the LP drum water must meet the same purity requirements as the steam itself and, therefore, the addition of caustic or phosphate to the LP steam water is not permitted.

Whether or not the condensate system is designed to include condensate polishers has a big impact on the selection of the cycle chemistry program. The design of any unit must include a means to handle the ingress of any impurities that may enter the system via condenser tube leaks, air in-leakage, makeup demineralizer operational issues, and the like. If condensate polishers are included as part of the plant design to remove any impurities that find their way into the system, AVT and OT chemistry programs can be utilized.

If no condensate polishers are included in the plant design, phosphate or caustic treatment programs should be employed to buffer or neutralize any ingress of impurities and minimize corrosion and deposition in the system. The POWER online archives are an excellent resource for those researching plant water chemistry topics, as well as other plant design, operation, and maintenance issues. For example, the following are 10 related articles, in alphabetical order, that discuss real-world experience with plant water chemistry and tube corrosion.

The updated search feature now automatically searches POWER and all sister publications— COAL POWER, GAS POWER, MANAGING POWER, and POWERnews. The proper water treatment process must be selected for the operating conditions and type of equipment, as just discussed. How the equipment is operated is equally important, as the water treatment process may be remarkably different at a baseload plant, a cycling plant, and one of the new generation of fast-start plants.

Oxygenated treatment programs are also best suited for steady load—type operations, whether the unit is a drum or once-through type boiler. Boilers operating in a cycling mode are best served chemistry-wise by employing an AVT program coupled with full-flow condensate polishing to remove any contaminants that may enter the cycle.

It is recommended that inorganic chemicals such as ammonium hydroxide and hydrazine be used as the pH adjuster and oxygen scavenger, but there are numerous organic substitutions on the market today that will also yield good results when properly applied under the advice of a water treatment expert. Fast-Start or Rapid-Response Designs. These plants cannot tolerate chemistry holds that have been standard in traditional fossil units and still meet their startup time or load swing guarantees.

Such plants should ideally include permanent condensate polishers as part of their standard design to maintain condensate and feedwater purity and minimize chemistry holds. For other fast-start designs, AVT chemistry programs coupled with a condensate polisher are generally the best choice to maintain a clean cycle and respond rapidly to changes.

Plants incorporating an air-cooled condenser ACC for condensation of the steam turbine exhaust have unique requirements for their cycle chemistry treatment program. The ACC design consists of a very large surface area for condensation of the exhaust steam. Though this large surface area works well for heat transfer purposes, it can upset the steam-water cycle chemistry. Newly erected ACCs are difficult to completely clean and tend to contribute a substantial amount of contaminants to the cycle during initial startup and even during unit restart if vacuum has been broken.

The large surface area also increases the likelihood of iron transport in the system, particularly during initial startup and during unit restarts, and the potential for air in-leakage in the system. Owners should seriously consider including a condensate put option volatility surface water when using an ACC. FAC concerns are also common in the ACC. In order to minimize FAC in an ACC, the pH in the early condensate must be increased above that required for an equivalent water-cooled condenser.

HP feedwater pH should be maintained in the range of 9. This may require supplemental chemical injection for the HP steam drum or HP feedwater. Steam from auxiliary boilers put option volatility surface water frequently utilized in combined cycle power plants for purposes such as pegging the deaerator during startup, holding vacuum overnight, or hotwell sparging.

The purity of the steam coming from the auxiliary boiler must be the same as the steam produced put option volatility surface water the main cycle. Therefore, the chemical treatment program utilized for the auxiliary boiler must be compatible with the operating pressure and temperatures of the main cycle, even though the auxiliary boiler typically operates at lower pressures and temperatures. For instance, nonvolatile oxygen scavengers are frequently used in industrial boilers operating at low pressures less than psi.

However, if the industrial boiler is serving as an auxiliary boiler that is supplying steam to an HRSG with a HP pressure of over psi, volatile oxygen scavengers such as hydrazine or carbohydrazide must be used in treating the auxiliary boiler, just as in the main steam cycle. The plant staffing plan and operating experience level of the team may also affect the choice of chemistry treatment for a unit. Managing a high-performance chemistry program AVT or OT requires tighter operating controls, more supervision of plant makeup water treatment systems and chemical additions, and a higher-level knowledge of steam cycle chemistry practices.

An operations team supported by a dedicated on-site plant chemist or chemistry technician specifically trained in these practices is preferable. If the facility is unable to provide this level of support and supervision of steam cycle chemistry, the better option is to use a phosphate chemical treatment program, which can be more forgiving when system upsets occur. The first nuclear reactor vessel at the Plant Vogtle expansion near Augusta, Ga. This time-lapse video shows construction contractors Westinghouse and Fluor Corp.

The vessel, fabricated by Doosan Heavy Industries in South Korea was put option volatility surface water to the construction site from the Port of Savannah on a specialized rail car, said Georgia Power on November Read more Visit our video archive. Mangaluru: DK stands second in installing roof top solar power plant- Ivan.

EIA Natural gas inventory. Natural-gas prices pare losses as rise in U. April 25, PM Eastern Daylight Time SAN FRANCISCO-- BUSINESS WIRE --Pacific Gas and Electric Company…. Adequate Electricity Supplies Expected, but Forecasts Show Possibility of Occasional Tight System Conditions April 26,…. The First Module's Fabrication Process Completes a Key Milestone, Continuing to Show Significant Progress SAN….

Subscribe to the print or digital magazine. Subscribe to POWER eletters. Official Publication of: Electric Power. Home Coal Recent Articles Columbia Study Casts Doubt on Trump Coal Plan [SLIDESHOW] A Decade of POWER's Plant of the Year Winners MPW's Automated Bundle Blaster SPONSORED Trump's EPA Signals Changes for Power Plant Mercury Rule DOE Issues First-Ever Emergency Order to Keep Open a Unit That Is Noncompliant with MATS Energy Secretary Perry: War on Coal Is Over Gas Recent Articles Drought Has Big Impact on California Power Market Columbia Study Casts Doubt on Trump Coal Plan Condition-Based Maintenance Bolsters the Bottom Line in Power Generation SPONSORED [SLIDESHOW] A Decade of POWER's Plant of the Year Winners GE Power Inks Its Largest Services Deal Ever Natural Gas Projected to Fuel Largest Share of U.

SPONSORED [SLIDESHOW] A Decade of POWER's Plant of the Year Winners Natural Gas Projected to Fuel Largest Share of U. Summer Power Generation Commodity Price Volatility Is Prime Concern Among Global Energy Leaders International Recent Articles Paris Agreement Debate Heats Up GE Power Inks Its Largest Services Deal Ever Red and green to grey -- Why switch my HMI? SPONSORED Commodity Price Volatility Is Prime Concern Among Global Energy Leaders Report: Global Renewable Investment Down, Capacity Grows THE BIG PICTURE: Prevailing Winds Business Recent Articles U.

Nuclear: From Hope to Despair Growth of Solar Power in China Offers Lessons for U. POWER magazine is offering a limited number of free magazine subscriptions. Hurry, time is running out. This offer expires soon. Selecting a Combined Cycle Water Chemistry Program. What Makes Combined Cycle Plants Special? Phosphate continuum control chart.

The chart provides a visual interpretation of the phosphate continuum operating ranges illustrating target pH and phosphate concentrations. Caustic injection control chart. This is a visual interpretation of the sodium hydroxide dosing rates recommended by EPRI. Looking for More HRSG Water Chemistry Resources? Get POWER e-letters FREE! Sign up to receive weekly and monthly e-letters written by POWER editors.

Editor POWER - Access Intelligence - Rockville, MD. Director - Business Technology Delivery Services - Omaha Public Power District - NE. Manager, Business Technology BT Support Services - Omaha Public Power District - NE. How Westinghouse, Symbol of U. DOE Issues First-Ever Emergency Order to Keep Open a Unit That Is Noncompliant with MATS. Nuclear: From Hope to Despair. Reducing Cycling Damage to Combined Cycle Steam Turbines. EPA Rescinds Effluent Limitations Guidelines Rule.

Growth of Solar Power in China Offers Lessons for U. Visit our video archive. ACCIONA and Secretary of State Pablos Inaugurate the put option volatility surface water MW San Roman Wind Farm in Cameron County. ISO New England: Managing Power Grid Operations This Summer. General Atomics Completes Heat Treatment of ITER's First Central Solenoid Module. GE Hitachi Awarded Outage Services Contract by Exelon Generation.

Implied Volatility Explained

Barrier options (single and double): Calculates prices, "Greeks" and implied volatility for American (using trinomial trees) and European. put (po͝ot) v. put, put ·ting, puts neogame-css.ru 1. To place in a specified location; set: She put the books on the table. 2. To cause to be in a specified condition: His. The Chicago Board of Options Exchange (CBOE) creates and tracks an index know as the Volatility Index (VIX), which is based on the implied volatility of S&P Index.

leave a comment